This blog post speaks about suggestions for improving the web usability of 2 sites. The first site is the web site of Bath and the second is the web site of Newcastle-upon-Tyre. I’ll describe and analyze each web site hence several sections and line items of Web usability.
The first section is Accessibility; this section contains not only traditional accessibility issues, but anything that might keep a visitor from being able to access the information on the web site. The site load-time was reasonable; text to background contrast was adequate and front size easy to read for both of the web sites. However for the web site of Newcastle the Flash and Add-ons weren’t used sparingly, indeed the home page was too cluttered. I think that this web site should take away some of the new technologies from the home page and make it more simple. Moreover both of these web sites haven’t a custom not-found page. It could be a god idea to one to guides visitors to content.
The second section is about Identity. A key question when someone first comes to your site is “Who are you?” and it’s important to answer it quickly. Logos companies were prominently placed, in the left corner on the top of the page. Home pages were digestible in 5 seconds, but for the web site of Newcastle one part of the home page was quite longer ( online booking option ). I think that a good think could be to make it less sophisticated because we have to keep “speed” in mind. Visitors need to get just the basic of the home page in few times. It’s also important to provide clear path to company information. For example with the good old “about us” page. The site of Bath uses it but I think it’s too short; visitors need an easy way to learn more about the company. My point of view is that this web site should provide more information or more complete.
The third section speaks about Navigation, as we know information architecture is a huge topic but some basics points cover it. The main navigation was easily identifiable but I think that the number of buttons should be reduced for both of these web sites. More than seven menu items could be confusing for visitors. And links need to be consistent and easy to identify, it’s not really the case for the web site of Newcastle. Indeed, the orange color isn’t really appropriate (blue should be better) and the fact is that there was a difference with the home page where black text was also a link. I think that only one color should be used. One other point is the site search which was good for both of them.
The last section focus on the content, it needs to be consistent, organized and easy to skim through. This section was quite ok for both of these web sites. However one point could be better of the web site of Newcastle, advertisings and pop-ups are obtrusive and not relevant for the content (for example ads about win 200£). It should be avoid and others ads more discreet.
So these web sites present some cons which should be changed in pros.